Page 49 - Preventing Youth Violence
P. 49

factors and support systems. For youth the domains for which data is obtained include

                 violence history; friends and family; anger, impulsivity and thinking skills; and protective
                 factors and support system.



                 The JRA-YV and the JRA-AV are semi-structured questionnaires consisting of 13 and 11

                 items, respectively.  It is important that the case officers/CCMOs who are administering
                 these instruments have basic training in social work theories and practice as they must

                 use structured professional judgment when administering the instruments. At this point in
                 the process a more in-depth interview is conducted with the client and the case officer

                 documents  the  details  under  the  specific  domains.  In  this  exercise,  case  officers  must
                 demonstrate good interviewing skills, anchored in basic knowledge of the principles and

                 theories relating to social work practice. The case officer/ CCMO must establish rapport
                 with clients, inviting their trust to ensure that the client is going to be truthful about personal

                 information  that  is  being  solicited.      It  is  recommended  that  the  case  officer  carefully
                 reviews  the  client’s  Referral/Intake  Form  and  Screener  before  engaging  the  individual

                 because the more information that is known, the CCMO will be able to probe for truthful
                 responses. Usually, the risk assessment is completed in a single session but at times the

                 CCMO may have to continue at a later date depending on the client’s frame of mind.
                 At the end of the risk assessment the client will need to be deemed high or medium/

                 moderate risk as a basis for proceeding in the programme. Clients who are low-risk are
                 not eligible for service. However, it is very rare that a client comes out being low-risk for

                 violence after scoring a ‘4’ on the Screener. The alignment between the outcome of the
                 assessment and the score from the Screener speaks to the effectiveness of the screening

                 process.  Collateral  information  on  clients’  background  and  current  activities  is  usually
                 gathered by the case officer from other sources such as CBOs, friends, family members,

                 schools, inter alia, to corroborate  the  self-reported information  provided by the  client
                 during the screening and risk assessment processes.



                 5. Case Plan Development

                 The next step in the process is determined by the outcome of the risk assessment stage.
                 Through probing, based on the questions on the risk assessment instrument and active

                 listening, the case officer is able to determine the risk level of the client.  The case officer will




                                                             23
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54