Page 34 - Preventing Youth Violence
P. 34

the Jamaican youth. Kevin Barnes Ceeney, Ph.D. and the CSJP team developed both
                 the adult and youth versions of the Jamaica Risk Assessment instruments. The instruments

                 were normed for suitability in the Jamaican context. The full Risk Assessment Instruments
                 (Screener, JRA-AV and JRA-YV) were normed using the first 1,085 participants (youths and

                 adults) who were risk assessed in the CSJP III in early 2016. During the norming process
                 three hypotheses were tested:

                 1.     Criminal history will predict higher initial screening scores for all clients
                 2.     Higher initial screening scores predict higher JRA risk scores for both adults and

                        youths
                 3.     Is the overall screening document associated with criminal history? What are the

                        most influential factors in the screener that contribute to criminal histories?



                 The  results  from  the  statistical  analyses  supported  all  three  hypotheses.  Hypothesis  1,
                 controlling  for  age  and  region,  highlighted  a  significant  relationship  between  criminal

                 history and a higher score at initial screening. For Hypothesis 2 it was shown that for every
                 point increase in the screening tool the odds of any individual being scored medium/high

                 risk increased by 24.0 and 27.0 per cent, for youths and adults, respectively.  Finally, for
                 the third hypothesis it was shown that all the factors outlined on the screening tool, when

                 combined, were significantly able to predict criminal history. It was further revealed that
                 being male was the strongest predictor, followed by current criminal justice involvement

                 and substance abuse. On their own the other factors were not significantly predictive of
                 criminal history (Barnes-Ceeney, 2017). By September 2016 CSJP was ready to roll out case

                 management as a lifeline to those individuals who posed the highest risk of crime and
                 violence across the 50 vulnerable communities it served.



                 THE CASE MANAGEMENT PROCESS

                 Case  management  is a  process  to  plan,  seek,  advocate  for,  and  monitor  services
                 from social service providers or health care organizations on behalf of a client. “Case

                 management can occur within a single, large organization or within a community program
                 that coordinates services among settings” (Barker, 2003 as cited in NASW, 2013, 13).

                 The case management process seeks to assist clients:
                 ●      To re-establish an awareness of their internal resources or strengths such as




                                                              8
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39