Page 28 - Violence Prevention Through the Engagement of Violence Producers
P. 28

BACKGROUND

                 Box 1: Cure Violence 2015 Training Plan for Jamaica



                    Level 1 Training: 4 days
                    The first level of training will be for the organizations and individuals doing the direct work with the
                    highest risk. In preparation of this training, CV proposes that a major consultation take place with PMI-
                    Kingston for two days to merge the best practices from both experiences that are to be implemented
                    within the training. This training will address identification and detection of violent events, engaging the
                    highest risk, interruption techniques and conflict mediation skills, behaviour change with the highest
                    risk, risk reduction planning, effective referrals for services for the highest risk, group level work to
                    promote norm change, Target area planning, documentation, and strategic planning. Characteristics
                    of individual participants: The invitees to Level 1 training will include relevant MNS staff as well as
                    individuals and organizations that will be working directly with the highest risk (as described in Section
                    1).

                    Outcomes: All participants have mastered the skills related to “Interrupting transmission of the disease
                    (violence),” “Reducing the risk of the highest risk,” and “Changing community norms” as part of the
                    interruption framework. This will be measured by pre and post-tests as well as observation during the
                    training.

                    Level 2 Training: 2 days
                    The second level of training will address shifting community norms around violence, risk reduction
                    planning,  and  effective  referrals  for  the  highest  risk,  public  education  development,  and  strategic
                    planning for implementation. The intention of this training is to have a larger group of people and
                    institutions that are part of the framework, but not doing the direct work with highest risk.

                    Characteristics of individual participants:  The invitees to level 2 training will include all relevant MNS
                    staff, PMI, CSJP Programming, Community groups, Faith leaders, Service providers, and UWI staff.

                    Outcomes: All  participants  have  mastered  the  skills  related  to  “Changing  community  norms”  and
                    “Reducing the risk of the highest risk” as part of the interruption framework. This will be measured by
                    pre and post-tests as well as observation during the training.

                    Level 3 Training: 2 days
                    The  third  level  of  the  training  will  cover  programme  monitoring  and  evaluation  for  the  interruption
                    framework  as  outlined  in  Section  5,  including  the  use  of  homicide  and  shooting  data  to  inform
                    implementation,  mapping  of  violent  incidents,  month  to  month  comparisons,  three  year  average
                    comparisons, timeline charts, and documentation tools to capture the work of the interruption framework
                    (including the CV database).


                    Characteristics of individual participants: The invitees to level 3 training will be the MNS and UWI
                    monitoring  staff.  Outcomes:  Shared  understanding  of  the  monitoring  tools  and  plan  for  their
                    implementation measured by a written plan.

                    Level 4 Training: 2 days
                    The fourth level of training will be on the implementation and management of the framework. It will cover
                    strategic planning and implementation, recruitment of organizations and workers for the framework,
                    facilitation of conflict mapping at the community level, types of meetings and agendas needed for
                    interruption work, use of data to inform implementation, goal setting, creation of a referral network for
                    highest risk, and coordination of independent evaluations.



                                                             10
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33