Page 121 - Violence Prevention Through the Engagement of Violence Producers
P. 121

EFFICIENCY OF THE VIOLENCE INTERRUPTION PROGRAMME



                 Rating: Strong



                 The  Peace  Management  Initiative  is  a  non-government  organization  that  struggles  for

                 funding; and this is very obvious in the way the VIs are compensated. To illustrate, PMI East
                 receives five million Jamaican dollars per month from CSJP. They also receive 1 million per

                 month from the Ministry of National Security. They must run the VIP from this small sum, as
                 well as address overheads. This dependence on the CSJP cannot be overlooked in the

                 analysis of their effective functioning. Between April and June of 2018, they only gave
                 PMI East 7 million or 2.33 million per month, driving them into financial chaos.  They also

                 received grants from international partners such as UNICEF and USAID; but these were not
                 enough to reduce the shock on VIs. As discussed earlier in the report, PMI East pays VIs a

                 stipend of 50,000 dollars per month; while PMI Western pays VIs 60,000. In other words, they
                 pay what they can afford. When PMI East was informed of the shortfall in cash it spoke

                 to its VI team and painfully all agreed to the 35,000 dollars that the Initiative could afford
                 until “better days come.” It is within this context that we conclude that the achievement

                 of 44 per cent reach of the highest risk youth is over-production or tremendous value for
                 money. The VIP could not be given an exceptional rating nonetheless, because its case

                 management aspect was too unreliable in instances. It certainly would have been more
                 efficient  to  train  a  set  of  VIs  to  do  their  own  case  management;  or  to  have  the  CSJP

                 designate a group of CCMOs to dedicate their entire effort to the case management of
                 VIs’ participants. If that had been done the output would have been astonishing.



                 IMPACT OF THE VIOLENCE INTERRUPTION PROGRAMME



                 Rating: Strong



                 The impact of the VIP must be viewed at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels, as

                 discussed in the report. At the tertiary level the VIs have done exceptionally well in some
                 instances, but average in others. Their impact here also needs to be assessed in the context

                 of the immediate needs of the communities. For instance, in March Pen, Lakes Pen and 31
                 St. John’s Road the task was to create a ceasefire, then build relationships to maintain the


                                                             27
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126