Page 34 - Disrupting the Transmission of Violence
P. 34

INTRODUCTION





                 In  child development  literature,  “coercive  parenting”  is described as the  use  of
                 “psychological  control”  in  parenting  to  discipline  or  influence  a  child  in  a  way  that
                 takes advantage of the child’s wish for love and approval (Bergin, 2011).  This type of

                 influence is further described as manipulative, because it involves using guilt, shaming,

                 withdrawal of affection, wounding with sarcasm, condescending remarks, and belittling,
                 or discounting the feelings or ideas of the child in order to ensure compliance from the
                 child.  In the Jamaican context, research has shown that parents frequently use corporal

                 punishment, shaming, rejection, and humiliation to discipline and control their children

                 (Ricketts & Anderson, 2008; Smith & Moore, 2013).  Such practices are similar to emotional
                 and physical abuse and the results are seen in the emotional and behavioural responses
                 of children, where they become angry, rebellious, develop anxiety and low self-esteem,

                 to name a few negative outcomes (Bergin, 2011).



                 In this chapter, we will explore some theoretical approaches that are related to parenting
                 practices: namely, Social Learning Theory and Ecological Systems Theory.  We will also

                 look briefly at concepts related to the emotional, cognitive and behavioural response

                 to coercive parenting. Additionally, we will offer a brief discussion on positive parenting
                 practices.



                 Social Learning Theory

                 Social Learning Theory is based on the premise that children acquire behavioral strategies
                 that are modeled by observing significant others in their environment (Bandura, 1965).
                 The “Bobo doll” experiment that was conducted provided strong support for this assertion

                 (Bandura, 1963).  This experiment was reinforced in an investigation on the emergence

                 of childhood disruptive behavior in the family context that was conducted by Patterson
                 (Patterson and Reid, 1984).



                 These investigations revealed that in families where parents exhibited low rates of positive

                 reinforcement and harsh discipline, aversive behavior was observed to be reciprocally
                 reinforcing  between  parents  and  children.    This  led  to  escalating  levels  of  negative



                                                             14
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39